• Be clear and concise. Do not leave room for misinterpretation.
  
• Use the active voice
  
• Avoid long sentences with a complicated structure
  
• Avoid expression and slang. Slang is difficult to translate and understand in a foreign context – is your audience going to understand "toque"?
  
• Write out abbreviations and acronyms the first time you use them to avoid confusion
  
• Translation costs are based on word count. Every word affects the bottom line, so be frugal but not at the expense of clarity
  

Using apps, computer programs and other resources to communicate with patients with low English proficiency. 

There are many apps and programs that are intended to support communication with patients with low English proficiency. Effective communication with patients is extremely important, however, these electronic and digital tools are not recommended for use within the healthcare setting. While some of these tools may seem helpful to communicate very simple messages, they can be risky.

All available machine translation or interpreting devices that are currently available pose a risk for misinterpretation. While misinterpretation can also occur with human to human interpreting, machine interpreting does not include the same opportunities for clarification that human to human interpreting provides.

Here are some questions that will also help you think about how a specific tool might be helpful or harmful in your work:

• Are there positive reviews in the literature from users of this tool? Are any negative impacts of using the tool described?
• Do you have sufficient information about how/when the tool should be used in order for it to be safe and effective?
• Was the tool developed in consultation with, or at least tested by, those who would use it in a healthcare setting?
• Was the tool reviewed by language and communication experts?
• Does the tool protect patient confidentiality as per the PHSA PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY policy?
• Do the images and functions included in the tool seem culturally appropriate for the patient?
• Does the tool address any issues for which consent are needed? When discussing issues that need consent with patients with low English proficiency, professional interpreters should always be used.
• Are you confident that the tool uses the appropriate dialect, tone and language for your patient?
• Does the tool seem to be sufficiently patient-centered, rather than solely allowing for the care provider to receive some of the information they want?
• Does the tool transfer any information directly into a patient's chart? This should never occur—all information that is input into a chart should be reviewed by a human for accuracy.